Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31741742›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical

Activity monitor use among persons with multiple sclerosis: Report on rate, pattern, and association with physical activity levels.

Stephanie L Silveira, Robert W Motl

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05243407 (Sensing Physical Activity to Evaluate and Monitor a Routine Aftercare Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05243407 completednot on this map

Sensing Physical Activity to Evaluate and Monitor a Routine Aftercare Program (SensE-M) - an Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2022 to 2022Enrolled23ConditionsDisease With a Risk for Chronicity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie L SilveiraDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1973-2119
Robert W MotlDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5894-2290
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommercially available activity monitors are a promising approach for tracking and changing physical activity in multiple sclerosis.

objectiveThis study reports on the rate and pattern of activity monitor use in persons with multiple sclerosis, and compares self-reported physical activity levels between persons who do wear and those who do not wear activity monitors.

methodsParticipants completed a cross-sectional survey that included a demographic and clinical characteristics scale, activity monitor use questionnaire, and Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) for measuring total and health-promoting physical activity.

resultsOf the 629 participants who completed the full survey, 249 (40%) reported using an activity monitor. The most common activity monitors were Fitbit, Apple watch, iPhone, and Garmin. There was a significant (

conclusionActivity monitor use is common among persons with multiple sclerosis, and activity monitor users report more total and health-promoting physical activity; this warrants further research investigating how devices may be used as a behavioral intervention tool.

Indexed as

Exercisefitness trackersleisure activitiesmovementmultiple sclerosisphysical fitness

Identifiers

PMID31741742
PMCPMC6843743
OpenAlexW2985935884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.