ArticleThe Visual computer2019
Object Tracking Based On Huber Loss Function.
Article in The Visual computer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper we present a novel visual tracking algorithm, in which object tracking is achieved by using subspace learning and Huber loss regularization in a particle filter framework. The changing appearance of tracked target is modeled by Principle Component Analysis (PCA) basis vectors and row group sparsity. This method takes advantage of the strengths of sub-space representation and explicitly takes the underlying relationship between particle candidates into consideration in the tracker. The representation of each particle is learned via the multi-task sparse learning method. Huber loss function is employed to model the error between candidates and templates, yielding robust tracking. We utilize the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) to solve the proposed representation model. In experiments we tested sixty representative video sequences that reflect the specific challenges of tracking and used both qualitative and quantitative metrics to evaluate the performance of our tracker. The experiment results demonstrated that the proposed tracking algorithm achieves superior performance compared to nine state-of-the-art tracking methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.