Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31741255›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2019

Obstetric and perinatal complications associated with assisted reproductive treatment in Spain.

Ana Ballesta-Castillejos, Juan Gomez-Salgado, Julian Rodriguez-Almagro, Inmaculada Ortiz-Esquinas, Antonio Hernández-Martínez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Influence of twin pregnancy by assisted reproductive technology on neonatal outcomes].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Ballesta-CastillejosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Nuestra Señora Del Prado, 45600 Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain.
Juan Gomez-SalgadoDepartment of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, University of Huelva, 21071, Huelva, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9053-7730
Julian Rodriguez-AlmagroDepartment of Nursing, Ciudad Real Nursing School, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13071, Ciudad Real, Spain. julianj.rodriguez@uclm.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6239-2842
Inmaculada Ortiz-EsquinasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mancha-Centro Hospital, 13600 Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0332-9904
Antonio Hernández-MartínezDepartment of Nursing, Ciudad Real Nursing School, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 13071, Ciudad Real, Spain.
University of Castilla-La Mancha · ESHospital General Nuestra Señora del Prado · ESUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough most newborns conceived through assisted reproductive treatments are healthy, there are concerns about the safety of reproductive techniques and their effect on foetal/maternal well-being.

objectiveThis study aims to describe the incidence of obstetric and perinatal complications in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatments in the Spanish Health System.

methodThis is a cross-sectional observational study aimed at women who have been mothers between 2013 and 2018 in Spain. The data was collected through an online survey of 42 items that was distributed through lactation associations and postpartum support groups. In the data analysis, crude odds ratios (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were calculated, through a multivariate analysis with binary logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression.

resultsFive thousand nine hundred forty-two women participated, 2.3% (139) through artificial insemination and 8.2% (486) through in vitro fertilisation (IVF) techniques. Women who underwent IVF had a higher likelihood of suffering problems during pregnancy (OR = 1.71; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), 1.37-2.13), delivery (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.02), and postpartum (OR = 1.94; 95% CI, 1.40-2.69) than women with spontaneous pregnancy. No increased likelihood of neonatal problems was observed in this group except for twin pregnancy (OR = 9.17; 95% CI, 6.02-13.96) and prematurity (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.02). No differences were observed between spontaneous pregnancies and those achieved by artificial insemination.

conclusionsPregnancies achieved through IVF present a higher risk of complications before, during and after delivery. However, there is no increased risk of neonatal problems except for a higher likelihood of twin pregnancy and prematurity.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsObstetric Labor ComplicationsPostnatal CarePregnancyPregnancy, TwinPremature BirthReproductive Techniques, AssistedSpainFertilization in vitroMorbidityObstetric labour complicationsPatient safetyQuality of health careReproductive techniques assisted

Identifiers

PMID31741255
PMCPMC6911128
OpenAlexW2986350483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.