Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31741250›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2019

Psychosocial interventions for cancer survivors: A meta-analysis of effects on positive affect.

John M Salsman, James E Pustejovsky, Stephen M Schueller, Rosalba Hernandez, Mark Berendsen, Laurie E Steffen McLouth, Judith T Moskowitz

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a self-directed online psychosocial intervention for women with metastatic breast cancer: Finding My Way-Advanced.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cancer-related pain in long-term survivors of oncological diseases: results of a survey on the current care situation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Beyond depression: correlates of well-being in young adult survivors of childhood cancers.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John M SalsmanDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, NC, 27157, USA. jsalsman@wakehealth.edu.
James E PustejovskyDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Stephen M SchuellerDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Rosalba HernandezSchool of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Mark BerendsenGalter Health Sciences Library, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Laurie E Steffen McLouthDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
Judith T MoskowitzDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Postdoctoral Training Program in Cancer SurvivorshipR25CA122061 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI AVIS, NANCY E · 2008 to 2018
$3.8M
Meta-Analysis of Positive Psychology Interventions for Cancer (MAPPIC)R03CA184560 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SALSMAN, JOHN · 2014 to 2015
$155k
NCI NIH HHS CA122061NCI NIH HHS CA184560NCI NIH HHS R03 CA184560NCI NIH HHS R25 CA122061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePositive affect has demonstrated unique benefits in the context of health-related stress and is emerging as an important target for psychosocial interventions. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to determine whether psychosocial interventions increase positive affect in cancer survivors.

methodsWe coded 28 randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions assessing 2082 cancer survivors from six electronic databases. We calculated 76 effect sizes for positive affect and conducted synthesis using random effects models with robust variance estimation. Tests for moderation included demographic, clinical, and intervention characteristics.

resultsInterventions had a modest effect on positive affect (g = 0.35, 95% CI [0.16, 0.54]) with substantial heterogeneity of effects across studies ([Formula: see text]; I

conclusionsIn-person interventions with survivors of early-stage cancers hold promise for enhancing positive affect, but more methodological rigor is needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Positive affect strategies can be an explicit target in evidence-based medicine and have a role in patient-centered survivorship care, providing tools to uniquely mobilize human strengths.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPsychologyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCancerInterventionsMeta-analysisPositive affectRandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID31741250
PMCPMC7330880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.