Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31741190›Full record

ArticleCulture, medicine and psychiatry2020

'A German Whore and no Money at that': Insanity and the Moral and Political Economies of German South West Africa.

Mattia Fumanti

Open access · hybridAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Culture, medicine and psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mattia FumantiDepartment of Social Anthropology, The University of St Andrews, 71 North Street, KY16 9AL, St Andrews, Fife, UK. mf610@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4940-7322
University of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203846/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 'Seed Award in HSS'
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the links between colonial psychiatry and racism figure prominently in histories of the diagnosis, treatment and institutionalisation of the mentally ill in Africa, there is an absence of patient-centred accounts, in the analysis of the efforts of the colonial-era subjects themselves to be pro-active not merely as the mentally ill, by clinical or court definition, but as persons embedded in social relationships with their kin and significant others. Moreover, despite an emerging scholarship, little is known of the experience of European settlers. In this respect there is a need for a more balanced representation, one that shows the ambivalence of colonial psychiatry and its reach into the lives of colonial subjects, Africans and Europeans alike. In this paper I focus on the narratives of a settler in German South West Africa and her efforts to escape diagnosis and institutionalisation. In building on a feminist approach to illness narratives, in particular on the idea of bearing empathic witness, I will explore the ways in which illness narratives can reveal the complex moral and political economies of the colonial world.

Indexed as

MoralsGermanyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansInsanity DefenseInterpersonal RelationsMental DisordersNamibiaNarrationPersons with Psychiatric DisordersPoliticsPsychiatryFeminist ethicsGenderGerman South West AfricaMental illnessMoral and political economiesNarratives

Identifiers

PMID31741190
PMCPMC7343752
OpenAlexW2983798061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.