Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31741161›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2020

Anatomical characteristics and classifications of gastrocolic trunk of Henle in laparoscopic right colectomy: preliminary results of multicenter observational study.

Zirui He, Hao Su, Kai Ye, Yueming Sun, Yincong Guo, Quan Wang, Yong Li, Dechang Diao, Chunkang Yang, Nan Wang and 18 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Zirui He *Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hao Su *Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kai YeSecond Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Yueming SunThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yincong GuoZhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China.
Quan WangThe First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yong LiGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Dechang DiaoGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Chunkang YangFujian Cancer Hospital and Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Nan WangTangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Ang LiXuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
WeiDong TongDaping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Peirong DingSun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yi XiaoPeking Union Medical Collage Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaojun ZhouThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zhangfa SongSir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Su YanQinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining, China.
Hongwei YaoBeijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wenjian MengWest China Hospital, Nanchong, China.
Donglei ZhouShanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Anlong ZhuFirst Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Yuan GaoAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Hao WangChanghai Hospital, Navy Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yiming ZhouHuaShan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, China.
Xinxiang LiFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Liang KangThe Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Minhua ZhengRuijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. zmhtiger@yeah.net.
Bo FengRuijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. fengbo2022@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a key landmark during laparoscopic right colectomy, the classification and variation of the gastrocolic trunk of Henle (GTH) remains to be clarified. The aim of this nationwide multicenter study was to describe the characteristics of the GTH intra-operatively during laparoscopic right colectomies.

methodsThree hundred seventy-one patients who underwent laparoscopic right colectomies from January 2018 to March 2019 in 25 hospitals across China were enrolled in the study. The length of the GTH, the classification with a precise description of confluent tributaries, and other variations were analyzed.

resultsOf the 371 patients, 363 had a GTH. The proportion of type-0, type-I, type-II, and type-III was 15.2% (n = 55), 54.8% (n = 199), 25.3% (n = 92), and 4.7% (n = 17), respectively. The average length of the GTH was 8.5 mm, ranging from 2 to 30 mm.

conclusionsThis is the first multicenter study with a large sample by which the GTH was classified based on laparoscopic intraoperative observation. Variations in the GTH were classified into four types based on the number of colic drainage veins (right colic, superior right colic, middle colic, accessory middle colic, and ileocolic veins), among which the right colic vein was the most common. The length of the GTH was relatively short, and thus might carry a risk of bleeding. Further clinical data should be correlated with the characteristics of the GTH.

Indexed as

ColectomyColonic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleAnatomic variationClassificationGastrocolic trunk of HenleLaparoscopic right colectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.