ArticleNeurogenetics2020
Childhood-onset autosomal recessive ataxias: a cross-sectional study from Turkey.
Article in Neurogenetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Yield of NGS Tests for Hereditary Ataxia: a Systematic Review.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Expanding the clinical spectrum of pediatric ataxia-telangiectasia: a case series of novel genetic variants, lupus vulgaris, and hyper-IgM phenotypes.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of hereditary ataxias: a real-world single center experience.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Understanding coenzyme Q.Physiological reviews · 2024Review
- A Rare Case of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Autosomal Recessive 21 Presented with Liver Disease.Advanced biomedical research · 2023Article
- Review
- NGS in Hereditary Ataxia: When Rare Becomes Frequent.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autosomal recessive ataxias (ARAs) are a heterogeneous group of inherited neurodegenerative disorders that affect the cerebellum, the spinocerebellar tract, and/or the sensory tracts of the spinal cord. This study is aimed at establishing molecular classification and phenotypic correlation of childhood-onset ARAs in Southeast Anatolia of Turkey. Sixty-five children (aged 0 to 18) from 40 unrelated families who were analyzed through hereditary ataxia NGS panel between the years of 2015-2018 were selected for the study. Seventeen different, clinically significant ARA-related pathogenic variants were detected in 33 of 40 families (82.5%), 12 of which were noted to be unreported variants. Among these 33 families, 24 had ATM-related (72.72%), four had SACS-related (12.12%), three had COQ8A-related (9.09%), and two had APTX-related (6.06%) pathogenic variants. The c.3576G>A (p.K1192=) was the most common homozygous pathogenic ATM variant (33.33%) that was associated with milder phenotype of ataxia telangiectasia (AT) with the onset of age of 3. Patients with SACS variants demonstrated developmental delay and progressive ataxia before the age of 3. Slowly progressive ataxia and intellectual disability were the common clinical manifestations of the patients with homozygous c.1396delG (p. E466Rfs*11) pathogenic variant in COQ8A. Homozygous APTX c.689T>G (p.V230G) pathogenic variant was identified in two patients who had chief complaint of ataxic gait onset after puberty. The most common types of ARAs in this region are AT- and Charlevoix-Saguenay-type spastic ataxia. ATM gene analysis should be performed foremost on children presenting early-onset ataxia from Southeastern Anatolia. If there is a concomitant peripheral neuron involvement, SACS gene analysis should be preferred. This valuable data will be a guide for the first step molecular diagnostic approach before requesting the NGS panel for ARA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.