Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31741132›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2019

Pancreas Transplantation from Donors after Circulatory Death: an Irrational Reluctance?

M Leemkuil, H G D Leuvenink, R A Pol

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M LeemkuilDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.leemkuil@umcg.nl.
H G D LeuveninkDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
R A PolDepartment of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewBeta-cell replacement is the best therapeutic option for patients with type 1 diabetes. Because of donor scarcity, more extended criteria donors are used for transplantation. Donation after circulatory death donors (DCD) are not commonly used for pancreas transplantation, because of the supposed higher risk of complications. This review gives an overview on the pathophysiology, risk factors, and outcome in DCD transplantation and discusses different preservation methods. RECENT

findingsStudies on outcomes of DCD pancreata show similar results compared with those of donation after brain death (DBD), when accumulation of other risk factors is avoided. Hypothermic machine perfusion is shown to be a safe method to improve graft viability in experimental settings. DCD should not be the sole reason to decline a pancreas for transplantation. Adequate donor selection and improved preservation techniques can lead to enhanced pancreas utilization and outcome.

Indexed as

DeathDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Donor SelectionGraft SurvivalHumansOrgan PreservationPancreas TransplantationRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTissue DonorsTreatment OutcomeDCDMachine perfusionPancreas transplantationPreservation

Identifiers

PMID31741132
PMCPMC6861341
OpenAlexW2984223243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.