Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31741124›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020

Extensive drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a comparative study between non-colistin based combinations.

Eman Elsayed, Mohamed A Elarabi, Dana A Sherif, Mohamed Elmorshedi, Noha El-Mashad

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Role of plasmid carrying3 Biotech · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eman Elsayed *Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura City, Egypt.
Mohamed A Elarabi *Clinical Pharmacy Department, Gastrointestinal Surgery Center (GISC), Mansoura University, Mansoura City, Egypt. mkeg93@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0276-769X
Dana A SherifClinical Pharmacy Department, Gastrointestinal Surgery Center (GISC), Mansoura University, Mansoura City, Egypt.
Mohamed ElmorshediDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Gastrointestinal Surgery Center (GISC), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura City, Egypt.
Noha El-MashadClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura City, Egypt.
Mansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The Gastrointestinal Surgery Center (GISC)-Mansoura University, faced a series of extensive drug resistant (XDR) A. baumannii cases, that were microbiologically resistant to penicillins, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, carbapenems and tigecycline. Colistin would have been a last resort therapy in such situation, however, intravenous polymyxins E (colistin) is relatively unavailable in Egypt. Many practitioners tried to form antibiotic combinations from the available antibiotics to overcome the resistance mechanisms of the pathogen. Objective Evaluate the clinical outcomes of these combinations retrospectively. Setting The study took place at the GISC, which is an academic specialized center affiliated with Mansoura University-Egypt. Method Clinical data were collected from the patients' files, where the subjects were classified into two major groups according to the therapeutic intervention. Group 1 included 24 patients divided into 4 subgroups. The first was treated by a Cephalosporin with a Fluoroquinolone (1A), The second was treated by a Carbapenem with a Fluoroquinolone (1B), The third was treated by a B-lactam with an Aminoglycoside (1C) and the fourth was treated by Carbapenem with a Glycylcycline (1D). Group 2 included 6 patients, treated with Tigecycline and Ampicillin-Sulbactam. Main outcome measure Primary outcomes are the A. baumannii microbiological culture negativity after 14 days of therapy and the 30 days' survival after the antibiotic course, while the secondary outcomes are the expected therapies' side effects. Results Group 2 is associated with significant higher primary outcomes without a significant difference regarding the secondary outcomes. Conclusion The combination of Tigecycline and Ampicillin-Sulbactam, appears to be a clinically effective therapy against XDR A. baumannii, despite each agent being resistant alone, without alerting adverse effects.

Indexed as

ColistinAcinetobacter baumanniiAcinetobacter InfectionsAdultAgedAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSulbactamTigecyclineAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistinSulbactamsultamicillinTigecyclineAcinetobacterAntibiotic combinationsAntibiotic resistanceColistin FreeEgyptMDR

Identifiers

PMID31741124
OpenAlexW2989852135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.