Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31741117›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2020

The emergence of animal models of chronic pain and logistical and methodological issues concerning their use.

Terence J Coderre, André Laferrière

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The paraEuropean journal of pain (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Advances in the understanding and treatment of pain and headache.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Terence J CoderreDepartment of Anesthesia, McGill University, 1203-3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y6, Canada. terence.coderre@mcgill.ca.
André LaferrièreDepartment of Anesthesia, McGill University, 1203-3655 Promenade Sir William Osler, Montreal, QC, H3G 1Y6, Canada.
McGill University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the development of and some logistical and methodological issues surrounding the use of animal models of chronic pain. The first section addresses the emergent move towards mechanism-based and disease-related animal models of chronic pain that has accelerated since the late 1980s following publication of Bennett and Xie's (Pain 33:87-107, 1998) paper on chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve and Stein et al.'s (Pharmacol Biochem Behav 31:445-451, 1988) paper on unilateral hind paw inflammation with complete Freund's adjuvant. The discussion covers vast areas of chronic pain models developed over the past 50 years, starting with the numerous neuropathic, inflammatory and central pain models, as well as the growing number of models developed to study various forms of chronic pain from chronic back pain to visceral pain. It also examines the advantages and disadvantages of tonic pain models, mechanism-based and disease-related models of chronic pain, including issues related to the novel discovery of injury- or disease-related pathophysiological processes, the expansion of testing repertoires, and the successes and failures in the translation of analgesic development from animal preclinical models to human chronic pain conditions. The second section addresses experimental design considerations in the implementation of one of the 3Rs for the use of animal models of chronic pain; that is methods employed to reduce the number of animals used. The discussion covers various issues including the advantages and disadvantages of repeated dose designs and within-group drug testing, including incremental dosing schedules, and crossover designs. It also examines concerns surrounding the stability of symptoms and measures, including varying durations of multiple symptoms and the potential development of nociceptive sensitization, as well as possible use-dependent alterations in drug sensitivity and time-dependent changes in pain processes in specific animal models.

Indexed as

Chronic PainDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsResearch DesignTranslational Research, Biomedical3RsChronic pain modelsCrossover designsMechanism-based and disease-related modelsRepeated dose trialsTranslation

Identifiers

PMID31741117
OpenAlexW2985650803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.