Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31740981›Full record

Trial reportStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2020

Prospective trial on telemonitoring of geriatric cancer patients using handheld devices.

Daniel Buergy, Victor Siefert, Christian Neumaier, Thomas Ganslandt, Elena Sperk, Manuel Blessing, Jürgen Hesser, Grit Welzel, Frederik Wenz, Frank Anton Giordano

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03196050 (Telemonitoring of Geriatric Cancer Patients Using Handheld Devices), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03196050 nacompletednot on this map

Telemonitoring of Geriatric Cancer Patients Using Handheld Devices (TeleGraPH)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsmedizin MannheimRan2016 to 2018Enrolled50ConditionsCancerArmsHandheld Device (Smart Phone)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mobile applications in radiation oncology-current choices and future potentials.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Oncologic treatment support via a dedicated mobile app: a prospective feasibility evaluation (OPTIMISE-1).Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel BuergyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Victor SiefertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Christian NeumaierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Thomas GanslandtHeinrich-Lanz-Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Elena SperkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Manuel BlessingExperimental Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Jürgen HesserExperimental Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Grit WelzelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Frederik WenzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Frank Anton GiordanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. Frank.Giordano@umm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5243-4781
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE AND

objectiveRandomized trials indicate that electronic or app-based assessment of patient-reported outcomes may improve outcomes in cancer patients. To analyze if an app-based follow-up would be accepted by elderly cancer patients, we conducted a single-center prospective feasibility study (NCT03196050). MATERIALS AND

methodsCancer patients (≥60 years) without concurrent uncontrolled severe medical conditions and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70 were eligible if they were able to use the smartphone app. The primary endpoint was compliance over 1 year, calculated as patient-specific and study date-specific response rate to questions sent as push notifications; in this interim analysis, we report on 4‑month data. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of a subjective health status item (SPHS) with the physician-rated KPS.

resultsOut of 225 patients screened, 54 patients agreed to participate and 29 activated the app and participated in the study. The mean age was 66 years (61-78). The individual compliance rate averaged at 58.3% (standard deviation SD = 35%). Daily compliance was 53.3% on average (SD = 10.8%) and declined over time. The average percentage of patients who sent answers at least weekly was 75.0% (SD = 14.8%) and declined from 100% in week 1 to 53.8% in week 17 post-enrollment. Secondary outcomes indicated that questionnaires such as the EORTC-QLQ-C30 are accepted via app and that there is a significant moderate correlation between the SPHS and KPS scores (r = 0.566; p < 0.001).

conclusionOur data indicate that an app-based follow-up incorporating EORTC questionnaires might be possible in highly selected elderly cancer patients with modest compliance rates. Further trials should aim at an increased participation rate.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSmartphoneTelemedicineAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient CompliancePatientsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesApp-based follow-upApp-based reportingElectronic health assessmentMobile healthPatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID31740981
OpenAlexW2985126786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.