Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31740957›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

DNA barcoding reveals that injected transgenes are predominantly processed by homologous recombination in mouse zygote.

Alexander Smirnov, Veniamin Fishman, Anastasia Yunusova, Alexey Korablev, Irina Serova, Boris V Skryabin, Timofey S Rozhdestvensky, Nariman Battulin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Transgene Mapping in Animals: What to Choose?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Pannexin 1 Transgenic Mice: Human Diseases and Sleep-Wake Function Revision.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander SmirnovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Veniamin FishmanInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Anastasia YunusovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexey KorablevInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Irina SerovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Boris V SkryabinMedical Faculty, Core Facility Transgenic animal and genetic engineering Models (TRAM), University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Timofey S RozhdestvenskyMedical Faculty, Core Facility Transgenic animal and genetic engineering Models (TRAM), University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Nariman BattulinInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUNovosibirsk State University · RUUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms that ensure repair of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) are instrumental in the integration of foreign DNA into the genome of transgenic organisms. After pronuclear microinjection, exogenous DNA is usually found as a concatemer comprising multiple co-integrated transgene copies. Here, we investigated the contribution of various DSB repair pathways to the concatemer formation. We injected mouse zygotes with a pool of linear DNA molecules carrying unique barcodes at both ends and obtained 10 transgenic embryos with 1-300 transgene copies. Sequencing the barcodes allowed us to assign relative positions to the copies in concatemers and detect recombination events that occurred during integration. Cumulative analysis of approximately 1,000 integrated copies reveals that over 80% of them underwent recombination when their linear ends were processed by synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) or double-strand break repair (DSBR). We also observed evidence of double Holliday junction (dHJ) formation and crossing over during the concatemer formations. Sequencing indels at the junctions between copies shows that at least 10% of DNA molecules introduced into the zygotes are ligated by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Our barcoding approach, verified with Pacific Biosciences Single Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) long-range sequencing, documents high activity of homologous recombination after DNA microinjection.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDNADNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, CruciformDNA End-Joining RepairDNA RepairHomologous RecombinationMiceTransgenesZygoteDNADNA, Cruciform

Identifiers

PMID31740957
PMCPMC7145541
OpenAlexW2991486978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.