Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31740842›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2019

An alternative hypothesis for the evolution of same-sex sexual behaviour in animals.

Julia D Monk, Erin Giglio, Ambika Kamath, Max R Lambert, Caitlin E McDonough

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Rethinking same-sex sexual behavior: From sensory error to social function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Multispecies analysis of social effects on same-sex sexual behavior challenges mistaken identity hypotheses in insects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Drivers of same-sex sexual behaviour.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Sex and Gender Identities Are Emergent Properties of Neural Complexity.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Reply to Ferraro et al.: Breed-and-feed reflects inevitable trade-offs between individual longevity and population sustainability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Julia D MonkSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. julia.monk@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5214-6576
Erin GiglioDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1617-7022
Ambika KamathMiller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Max R LambertDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2318-6445
Caitlin E McDonoughCenter for Reproductive Evolution, Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8949-7479
Miller College · USSyracuse University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Same-sex sexual behaviour (SSB) has been recorded in over 1,500 animal species with a widespread distribution across most major clades. Evolutionary biologists have long sought to uncover the adaptive origins of 'homosexual behaviour' in an attempt to resolve this apparent Darwinian paradox: how has SSB repeatedly evolved and persisted despite its presumed fitness costs? This question implicitly assumes that 'heterosexual' or exclusive different-sex sexual behaviour (DSB) is the baseline condition for animals, from which SSB has evolved. We question the idea that SSB necessarily presents an evolutionary conundrum, and suggest that the literature includes unchecked assumptions regarding the costs, benefits and origins of SSB. Instead, we offer an alternative null hypothesis for the evolutionary origin of SSB that, through a subtle shift in perspective, moves away from the expectation that the origin and maintenance of SSB is a problem in need of a solution. We argue that the frequently implicit assumption of DSB as ancestral has not been rigorously examined, and instead hypothesize an ancestral condition of indiscriminate sexual behaviours directed towards all sexes. By shifting the lens through which we study animal sexual behaviour, we can more fruitfully examine the evolutionary history of diverse sexual strategies.

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimals

Identifiers

PMID31740842
OpenAlexW2984265803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.