Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31740817›Full record

ArticleNature methods2020

Time-resolved imaging-based CRISPRi screening.

Daniel Camsund, Michael J Lawson, Jimmy Larsson, Daniel Jones, Spartak Zikrin, David Fange, Johan Elf

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Fast, StreamlinedChemical & biomedical imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular kinetics dictate population dynamics in CRISPR-based plasmid defense.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A platform for multimodalbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Application of functional genomics for domestication of novel non-model microbes.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Camsund *Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7471-7539
Michael J Lawson *Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. lawsonjmichael@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2868-733X
Jimmy LarssonDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Daniel JonesDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Spartak ZikrinDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
David FangeDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Johan ElfDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. johan.elf@icm.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5522-1810
Uppsala University · SECalifornia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our ability to connect genotypic variation to biologically important phenotypes has been seriously limited by the gap between live-cell microscopy and library-scale genomic engineering. Here, we show how in situ genotyping of a library of strains after time-lapse imaging in a microfluidic device overcomes this problem. We determine how 235 different CRISPR interference knockdowns impact the coordination of the replication and division cycles of Escherichia coli by monitoring the location of replication forks throughout on average >500 cell cycles per knockdown. Subsequent in situ genotyping allows us to map each phenotype distribution to a specific genetic perturbation to determine which genes are important for cell cycle control. The single-cell time-resolved assay allows us to determine the distribution of single-cell growth rates, cell division sizes and replication initiation volumes. The technology presented in this study enables genome-scale screens of most live-cell microscopy assays.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsCell CycleDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene LibraryGenotypeImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMetabolic EngineeringMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMicroscopyPhenotypeEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31740817
OpenAlexW2988799915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.