Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31740762›Full record

ReviewNature chemistry2020

A review and critique of academic lab safety research.

A Dana Ménard, John F Trant

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Steering towards safe self-driving laboratories.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biosafety Level 2 Training Programs at Institutions of Higher Learning in the United States.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Laboratory quality management system fundamentals.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Insights from a laboratory fire.Nature chemistry · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A Dana MénardFaculty of Science, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada. admenard@uwindsor.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3503-5559
John F TrantDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada. jtrant@uwindsor.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4780-4968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past ten years, there have been several high-profile accidents in academic laboratories around the world, resulting in significant injuries and fatalities. The aftermath of these incidents is often characterized by calls for reflection and re-examination of the academic discipline's approach to safety research and policy. However, the study of academic lab safety is still underdeveloped and necessary data about changes in safety attitudes and behaviours has not been gathered. This Review article critically examines the state of academic chemical safety research from a multifactorial stance, including research on the occurrence of lab accidents, contributors to lab accidents, the state of safety training research and the cultural barriers to conducting safety research and implementing safer lab practices. The Review concludes by delineating research questions that must be addressed to minimize future serious academic laboratory incidents as well as stressing the need for committed leadership from our research institutions.

Indexed as

Accident PreventionAccidentsAttitudeChemical SafetyChemistryCultureHumansLaboratoriesResearchSafety Management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.