Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31740748›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Different lasers reveal different skin microcirculatory flowmotion - data from the wavelet transform analysis of human hindlimb perfusion.

L Monteiro Rodrigues, Clemente Rocha, Hugo Ferreira, Henrique Silva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L Monteiro RodriguesCBIOS - Universidade Lusófona's Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies, Av Campo Grande, 1749 024, Lisboa, Portugal. monteiro.rodrigues@ulusofona.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0198-7671
Clemente RochaCBIOS - Universidade Lusófona's Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies, Av Campo Grande, 1749 024, Lisboa, Portugal.
Hugo FerreiraIBEB - Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering Institute, Universidade de Lisboa Faculty of Sciences, Campo Grande, 1749 016, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4323-3942
Henrique SilvaCBIOS - Universidade Lusófona's Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies, Av Campo Grande, 1749 024, Lisboa, Portugal.
University of Lisbon · PTUniversidade Lusófona · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and reflection photoplethysmography (PPG) are standard technologies to access microcirculatory function in vivo. However, different light frequencies mean different interaction with tissues, such that LDF and PPG flowmotion curves might have distinct meanings, particularly during adaptative (homeostatic) processes. Therefore, we analyzed LDF and PPG perfusion signals obtained in response to opposite challenges. Young healthy volunteers, both sexes, were assigned to Group 1 (n = 29), submitted to a normalized Swedish massage procedure in one lower limb, increasing perfusion, or Group 2 (n = 14), submitted to a hyperoxia challenge test, decreasing perfusion. LDF (Periflux 5000) and PPG (PLUX-Biosignals) green light sensors applied distally on both lower limbs recorded perfusion changes for each experimental protocol. Both techniques detected the perfusion increase with massage, and the perfusion decrease with hyperoxia, in both limbs. Further analysis with the wavelet transform (WT) revealed better depth-related discriminative ability for PPG (more superficial, less blood sampling) compared with LDF in both challenges. Spectral amplitude profiles consistently demonstrated better sensitivity for LDF, especially regarding the lowest frequency components. Strong correlations between components were not found. Therefore, LDF and PPG flowmotion curves are not equivalent, a relevant finding to better study microcirculatory physiology.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansHyperoxiaLaser-Doppler FlowmetryLegMaleMassageMicrocirculationPhotoplethysmographySkinToesWavelet AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31740748
PMCPMC6861459
OpenAlexW2984603238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.