Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31740715›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in metastatic breast cancer is not an independent predictor of survival, but depends on other variables.

Alejandra Ivars Rubio, Juan Carlos Yufera, Pilar de la Morena, Ana Fernández Sánchez, Esther Navarro Manzano, Elisa García Garre, Elena García Martinez, Gema Marín Zafra, Manuel Sánchez Cánovas, Esmeralda García Torralba and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alejandra Ivars RubioServicio de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Juan Carlos YuferaUniversidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Pilar de la MorenaServicio de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Ana Fernández SánchezServicio de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Esther Navarro ManzanoServicio de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Elisa García GarreServicio de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Elena García MartinezServicio de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Gema Marín ZafraServicio de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Manuel Sánchez CánovasServicio de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Esmeralda García TorralbaServicio de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Francisco Ayala de la PeñaServicio de Hematología y Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain. frayala@um.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic impact of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been previously evaluated in early and metastatic mixed breast cancer cohorts or without considering other relevant prognostic factors. Our aim was to determine whether NLR prognostic and predictive value in MBC was dependent on other clinical variables. We studied a consecutive retrospective cohort of patients with MBC from a single centre, with any type of first line systemic treatment. The association of NLR at diagnosis of metastasis with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Cox univariate and multivariate proportional hazard models. In the full cohort, that included 263 MBC patients, a higher than the median (>2.32) NLR was significantly associated with OS in the univariate analysis (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.00-1.83), but the association was non-significant (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.80-1.56) when other clinical covariates (performance status, stage at diagnosis, CNS involvement, visceral disease and visceral crisis) were included in the multivariate analysis. No significant association was observed for PFS. In conclusion, MBC patients with higher baseline NLR had worse overall survival, but the prognostic impact of NLR is likely derived from its association with other relevant clinical prognostic factors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukocyte CountLymphocytesMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm MetastasisNeutrophilsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID31740715
PMCPMC6861311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.