Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31740714›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Identification of novel predictive factors for post surgical corneal haze.

Nimisha R Kumar, Pooja Khamar, Rohit Shetty, Ankit Sharma, Naren Shetty, Natasha Pahuja, Valsala Gopalakrishnan Abilash, Vishal Jhanji, Anuprita Ghosh, Rajiv R Mohan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy-Review.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Corneal stromal repair and regeneration.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Multimodal imaging for refractive surgery:Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Nimisha R KumarGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.
Pooja KhamarCornea and Refractive Surgery Division, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India.
Rohit ShettyCornea and Refractive Surgery Division, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India.
Ankit SharmaThrombosis Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Naren ShettyCornea and Refractive Surgery Division, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India.
Natasha PahujaCornea and Refractive Surgery Division, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, India.
Valsala Gopalakrishnan AbilashDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, VIT, Vellore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0780-0492
Vishal JhanjiDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Anuprita GhoshGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6570-5891
Rajiv R MohanDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Rajani Kanth VangalaThrombosis Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Arkasubhra GhoshGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, India. arkasubhra@narayananethralaya.com.
Narayana Nethralaya · INSingapore Eye Research Institute · SGThrombosis Research Institute · INHarry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular factors altered in corneas that develop haze post refractive surgery have been described, but pre-existing factors that predispose clinically normal corneas to aberrant fibrosis post surgery and the role of the corneal epithelium remains unknown. We analyzed the global gene expression in epithelium collected intraoperatively from subjects undergoing photorefractive keratectomy. Subjects were grouped into those that developed haze 12 months post surgery (n = 6 eyes; haze predisposed) and those that did not develop haze in a similar follow up duration (n = 11 eyes; controls). Ontological analysis of 1100 upregulated and 1780 downregulated genes in the haze predisposed group revealed alterations in pathways associated with inflammation, wnt signaling, oxidative stress, nerve functions and extra cellular matrix remodeling. Novel factors such as PREX1, WNT3A, SOX17, GABRA1and PXDN were found to be significantly altered in haze predisposed subjects and those with active haze(n = 3), indicating their pro-fibrotic role. PREX1 was significantly upregulated in haze predisposed subjects. Ectopic expression of PREX1 in cultured human corneal epithelial cells enhanced their rate of wound healing while its ablation using shRNA reduced healing compared to matched controls. Recombinant TGFβ treatment in PREX1 overexpressing corneal cells led to enhanced αSMA expression and Vimentin phosphorylation while the converse was true for shPREX1 expressing cells. Our data identify a few novel factors in the corneal epithelium that may define a patient's risk to developing post refractive corneal haze.

Indexed as

AdultCell LineCell MovementCohort StudiesCorneal OpacityEpithelium, CornealFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHumansMaleMyopiaPhotorefractive KeratectomyPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsPREX1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31740714
PMCPMC6861263
OpenAlexW2985762760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.