Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31740592›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Chemical and microbial diversity covary in fresh water to influence ecosystem functioning.

Andrew J Tanentzap, Amelia Fitch, Chloe Orland, Erik J S Emilson, Kurt M Yakimovich, Helena Osterholz, Thorsten Dittmar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Logging disrupts the ecology of molecules in headwater streams.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. mLife · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew J TanentzapDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom; ajt65@cam.ac.uk.
Amelia FitchDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1757-2219
Chloe OrlandDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.
Erik J S EmilsonDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1516-9728
Kurt M YakimovichVale Living with Lakes Centre, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON P3E 6H5, Canada.
Helena OsterholzInstitute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg 26129, Germany.
Thorsten DittmarInstitute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg 26129, Germany.
University of Cambridge · GBCarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DELaurentian University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invisible to the naked eye lies a tremendous diversity of organic molecules and organisms that make major contributions to important biogeochemical cycles. However, how the diversity and composition of these two communities are interlinked remains poorly characterized in fresh waters, despite the potential for chemical and microbial diversity to promote one another. Here we exploited gradients in chemodiversity within a common microbial pool to test how chemical and biological diversity covary and characterized the implications for ecosystem functioning. We found that both chemodiversity and genes associated with organic matter decomposition increased as more plant litterfall accumulated in experimental lake sediments, consistent with scenarios of future environmental change. Chemical and microbial diversity were also positively correlated, with dissolved organic matter having stronger effects on microbes than vice versa. Under our experimental scenarios that increased sediment organic matter from 5 to 25% or darkened overlying waters by 2.5 times, the resulting increases in chemodiversity could increase greenhouse gas concentrations in lake sediments by an average of 1.5 to 2.7 times, when all of the other effects of litterfall and water color were considered. Our results open a major new avenue for research in aquatic ecosystems by exposing connections between chemical and microbial diversity and their implications for the global carbon cycle in greater detail than ever before.

Indexed as

BiodiversityCarbon CycleDNA, EnvironmentalFresh WaterGeologic SedimentsGreenhouse GasesLakesMetagenomeMetagenomicsTracheophytaDNA, EnvironmentalGreenhouse Gasescarbon cyclingchemical diversityfresh watersmicrobial diversity

Identifiers

PMID31740592
PMCPMC6900631
OpenAlexW2987218928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.