Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31740520›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2020

Adult Cancer Survivors' Engagement and Interest in Patient-Centered Research.

Margaret M Lubas, Yan Lu, Aaron W Gehr, Bassam Ghabach, Bhavna Tanna, Kalyani Narra, Tara M Brinkman, Rohit P Ojha

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Somatosensory amplification and fear of cancer recurrence: Moderating effects of emotion regulation difficulties.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret M LubasDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Yan LuCenter for Outcomes Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas.
Aaron W GehrCenter for Outcomes Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas.
Bassam GhabachJPS Oncology and Infusion Center, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas.
Bhavna TannaJPS Oncology and Infusion Center, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas.
Kalyani NarraJPS Oncology and Infusion Center, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas.
Tara M BrinkmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Rohit P OjhaCenter for Outcomes Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas. rojha@jpshealth.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-8990
JPS Health Network · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

Training in Pediatric Cancer Survivorship Outcomes and InterventionsT32CA225590 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Kevin R Krull · 2018 to 2026
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA225590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited information is available about the representativeness of survivors engaging in patient-centered research, despite the potential for threats to generalizability. We thus aimed to assess the representativeness of survivors engaged or interested in research development.

methodsWe used data from the Health Information National Trends Survey, a nationally representative survey, to identify survivors of adult cancers. Our outcomes of interest were based on responses to questions about engagement or interest in developing patient-centered research. We estimated the ratio of relative frequencies (RRF) and corresponding 95% confidence limits (CL) of sociodemographic and survivorship characteristics between survivors engaged or interested in patient-centered research and the overall survivor population.

resultsOur study population comprised 934 survivors, of whom 5% reported being engaged in patient-centered research and 26% reported an interest in participating. Relative frequencies of characteristics were discordant for engaged survivors but largely similar for interested survivors compared with all survivors. In particular, engaged survivors had a higher relative frequency of individuals ages 50 to 64 years (RRF = 1.7; 95% CL, 1.1-2.5), Hispanic (RRF = 2.9; 95% CL, 1.2-6.9), non-Hispanic Black (RRF = 2.9; 95% CL, 1.1-2.5), and unemployment (RRF = 4.7; 95% CL, 1.4-16).

conclusionsWe observed several meaningful differences in the characteristics of survivors engaged in patient-centered research compared with all survivors, which raises concerns about the generalizability of findings from such studies. IMPACT: Patient-centered research may not benefit the broader survivor community if survivors engaging in research development are not representative of all survivors. Greater attention to recruiting mechanisms is necessary to avoid creating disparities.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCancer SurvivorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31740520
PMCPMC7007350
OpenAlexW2986558290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.