Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31739808›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2019

Spatial patterning and correlates of self-harm in Manchester, England.

Chien-Yu Lin, Harriet Bickley, Caroline Clements, Roger T Webb, David Gunnell, Chia-Yueh Hsu, Shu-Sen Chang, Nav Kapur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chien-Yu LinInstitute of Health Behaviors and Community Sciences, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-8730
Harriet BickleyDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Caroline ClementsDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Roger T WebbDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David GunnellBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Chia-Yueh HsuDepartment of Psychiatry, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shu-Sen ChangInstitute of Health Behaviors and Community Sciences, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Nav KapurDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, Centre for Mental Health and Safety, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate the spatial distribution of self-harm incidence rates, their socioeconomic correlates and sex/age differences using data on self-harm presentations to emergency departments from The Manchester Self-Harm Project (2003-2013).

methodsSmoothed standardised incidence ratios for index self-harm episodes (n = 14 771) and their associations with area-level socioeconomic factors across 258 small areas (median population size = 1470) in the City of Manchester municipality were estimated using Bayesian hierarchical models.

resultsHigher numbers and rates of self-harm were found in the north, east and far southern zones of the city, in contrast to below average rates in the city centre and the inner city zone to the south of the centre. Males and females aged 10-24, 25-44 and 45-64 years showed similar geographical patterning of self-harm. In contrast, there was no clear pattern in the group aged 65 years and older. Fully adjusted analyses showed a positive association of self-harm rates with the percentage of the unemployed population, households privately renting, population with limiting long-term illness and lone-parent households, and a negative association with the percentage of ethnicity other than White British and travel distance to the nearest hospital emergency department. The area-level characteristics investigated explained a large proportion (four-fifths) of the variability in area self-harm rates. Most associations were restricted to those aged under 65 years and some associations (e.g. with unemployment) were present only in the youngest age group.

conclusionsThe findings have implications for allocating prevention and intervention resources targeted at high-risk groups in high incidence areas. Targets for area-based interventions might include tackling the causes and consequences of joblessness, better treatment of long-term illness and consideration of the accessibility of health services.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsChildEnglandFemaleGeography, MedicalHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSelf-Injurious BehaviorSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultDeprivationself-harmsocial fragmentationsocioeconomic characteristicsspatial analysis

Identifiers

PMID31739808
PMCPMC8061130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.