ArticleBMC medical genomics2019
Correction to: RNA sequencing identifies novel non-coding RNA and exon-specific effects associated with cigarette smoking.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- B-cell immune repertoire sequencing in tobacco cigarette smoking, vaping, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the COPDGene cohort.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Mechanism of Action of Decitabine in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Regulating LINC00599.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors provided an updated accession number in the "Availability of data and materials" section of the declarations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.