Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31739784›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

Study protocol: a single-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial comparing dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, internal brace ligament augmentation and reconstruction in individuals with an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: LIBRƎ study.

Christiaan H W Heusdens, Katja Zazulia, Ella Roelant, Lieven Dossche, Damien van Tiggelen, Johan Roeykens, Elke Smits, Johan Vanlauwe, Pieter Van Dyck

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03441295 (Single-blind, Multi-centre, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ligamys Anterior Cruciate Ligament), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03441295 naunknown statusnot on this map

Single-blind, Multi-centre, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ligamys Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Repair, Internal Bracing ACL Repair and Conventional ACL Reconstruction for Relative Clinical Efficacy and Economic Benefit.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AntwerpRan2018 to 2025Enrolled95ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureArmsDynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization, Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation, ACL Reconstruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of internal brace ligament augmentation technique in knee ligament injury: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. [Application of internal brace ligament augmentation technology in repair and reconstruction of cruciate ligament injuries].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. [Research progress of suture augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Suture tape augmentation ACL repair, stable knee, and favorable PROMs, but a re-rupture rate of 11% within 2 years.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. ACL repair for athletes?Journal of orthopaedics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christiaan H W HeusdensDepartment of Orthopaedics, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium. Krik.Heusdens@uza.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0385-8128
Katja ZazuliaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Ella RoelantClinical Trial Center (CTC), CRC Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Lieven DosscheDepartment of Orthopaedics, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Damien van TiggelenDepartment of Traumatology and Rehabilitation, Queen Astrid Military Hospital, Bruynstraat 1, 1120, Neder-Over-Heembeek, Belgium.
Johan RoeykensDepartment of Rehabilitation, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Elke SmitsDepartment of Medical management, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Johan VanlauweDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Jette, Belgium.
Pieter Van DyckDepartment of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Antwerp University Hospital · BEQueen Astrid Military Hospital · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek T001017N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current gold standard for the treatment of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is reconstruction with tendon graft. Recently, two surgical ACL repair techniques have been developed for treating an acute ACL rupture: Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization (DIS, Ligamys®) and Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation (IBLA, InternalBrace™). We will conduct a single-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial which compares DIS, IBLA and reconstruction for relative clinical efficacy and economic benefit.

methodsSubjects, aged 18-50 years, with a proximal, primary and repairable ACL rupture will be included. DIS is preferably performed within 4 weeks post-rupture, IBLA within 12 weeks and reconstruction after 4 weeks post-rupture. Patients are included in study 1 if they present within 0-4 weeks post-rupture and surgery is feasible within 4 weeks post-rupture. Patients of study 1 will be randomized to either DIS or IBLA. Patients are included in study 2 if they present after 4 weeks post-rupture and surgery is feasible between 5 and 12 weeks post-rupture. Patients of study 2 will be randomized to either IBLA or reconstruction. A total of 96 patients will be included, with 48 patients per study and 24 patients per study arm. Patients will be followed-up for 2 years. The primary outcome is change from baseline (pre-rupture) in International Knee Documentation Committee score to 6 months post-operatively. The main secondary outcomes are the EQ-5D-5 L, Tegner score, Lysholm score, Lachman test, isokinetic and proprioceptive measurements, magnetic resonance imaging outcome, return to work and sports, and re-rupture/failure rates. The statistical analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. The economic impact of the surgery techniques will be evaluated by the cost-utility analysis. The LIBRƎ study is to be conducted between 2018 and 2022. DISCUSSION: This LIBRƎ study protocol is the first study to compare DIS, IBLA and ACL reconstruction for relative clinical efficacy and economic benefit. The outcomes of this study will provide data which could aid orthopaedic surgeons to choose between the different treatment options for the surgical treatment of an acute ACL rupture.

trial registrationThis study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03441295. Date registered 13.02.2018.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionBracesAdolescentAdultAnterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesBelgiumBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHamstring TendonsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionAcute anterior cruciate ligament ruptureAnterior cruciate ligamentAnterior cruciate ligament injuryAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionAnterior cruciate ligament repairKneeOrthopaedics

Identifiers

PMID31739784
PMCPMC6862787
OpenAlexW2989307365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.