Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31739404›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Risk of Cancer for Workers Exposed to Antimony Compounds: A Systematic Review.

Anton Saerens, Manosij Ghosh, Jelle Verdonck, Lode Godderis

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anton SaerensDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre Environment & Health, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Manosij GhoshDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre Environment & Health, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5034-001X
Jelle VerdonckDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre Environment & Health, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Lode GodderisDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre Environment & Health, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4764-8835

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimony (Sb) trioxide and antimony trisulfide are "2B: Possibly carcinogenic to humans" and "3: Unclassifiable" according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) concluded that antimony trioxide "is reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen based on studies in rats and mice". We investigated the cancer hazard of antimony compounds for workers, a population with high exposure to antimony substances.

methodsUsing the "Guidelines for performing systematic reviews in the development of toxicity factors" (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) 2017) as a guidance, we established a human and an animal toxicology data stream in Medline and ToxLine. Data from this review were applied in a human health risk assessment.

resultsA final pool of 10 occupational and 13 animal toxicology articles resulted after application of TCEQ guidelines.

conclusionsAntimony carcinogenicity evidence involving workers is inadequate, based on confounding, small sample sizes, incomparability across studies, and inadequate reference populations. An increased lung cancer risk cannot be excluded. Evidence for lung neoplasms caused by antimony trioxide inhalation in experimental animals is sufficient. Overall, carcinogenicity in workers is probable (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) 2A). It remains unclear from what occupational exposure duration and dose this effect arises and whether exposure threshold values should be reconsidered.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentAnimalsAntimonyCarcinogensHumansMiceModels, AnimalNeoplasmsOccupational ExposureRatsTexasAntimonyCarcinogensantimonycanceroccupational healthrisk assessmentsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31739404
PMCPMC6888331
OpenAlexW2988401428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.