Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31738895›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2020

The Use of Electrotherapeutics in Ophthalmology.

Kieu-Yen Luu, Min Zhao, Mark J Mannis

Abstract readHistorical ArticlePortrait
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kieu-Yen LuuDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Min ZhaoDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Mark J MannisDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA. Electronic address: mjmannis@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

VISION RESEARCH CORE GRANTP30EY012576 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LISA M OAKES · 1999 to 2026
$18.9M
Molecular Generators at Corneal Wounds Produce and regulate the Wound Electrical SignalsR01EY019101 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ZHAO, MIN · 2010 to 2023
$5.2M
Feasibility gamma stimulation to reduce beta-amyloid load across speciesR21AG060335 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZANTO, THEODORE P, ZHAO, MIN · 2018 to 2019
$439k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012576NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019101NIA NIH HHS R21 AG060335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo present a perspective on the use of electrotherapeutics in the history of ophthalmology along with the development of novel contemporary ophthalmic instrumentation.

designPerspective study.

methodsWe reviewed historical journals, articles, and books discussing the use of electricity and electrotherapeutics in ophthalmology.

resultsElectrotherapeutic applications have been researched and used to treat ocular diseases as far back as the 18th century. By the 20th century, research in electrotherapeutics in ophthalmology had caught the eye of Edward Jackson, the first president of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology and first editor of the present (third) series American Journal of Ophthalmology. Edward Jackson published an extensive review on this topic and reported a variety of modalities used to treat ocular diseases.

conclusionsWhile many early therapeutic uses of electricity did not produce effective and replicable results, studies on electrical stimulation of the eye provided the foundation for the development of clinically significant vision enhancing and restoring instrumentation.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyEye DiseasesHistory, 15th CenturyHistory, 16th CenturyHistory, 17th CenturyHistory, 18th CenturyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHistory, AncientHistory, MedievalHumansOphthalmologyProspective StudiesVisual Prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID31738895
PMCPMC7949834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.