Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31738747›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Contrasting the impact of cytotoxic and cytostatic drug therapies on tumour progression.

Jani V Anttila, Mikhail Shubin, Johannes Cairns, Florian Borse, Qingli Guo, Tommi Mononen, Ignacio Vázquez-García, Otto Pulkkinen, Ville Mustonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Modulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. C-6-Modified 2-F-Fucose Derivatives as Inhibitors of Fucosyltransferases.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Transcriptomic analysis revealsOncology letters · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jani V AnttilaOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2102-1930
Mikhail ShubinDepartment of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0677-6761
Johannes CairnsOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1329-2025
Florian BorseOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Qingli GuoOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tommi MononenOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3603-0813
Ignacio Vázquez-GarcíaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0427-2639
Otto PulkkinenDepartment of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5739-6278
Ville MustonenOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7270-1792

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Cancer Research UKNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A tumour grows when the total division (birth) rate of its cells exceeds their total mortality (death) rate. The capability for uncontrolled growth within the host tissue is acquired via the accumulation of driver mutations which enable the tumour to progress through various hallmarks of cancer. We present a mathematical model of the penultimate stage in such a progression. We assume the tumour has reached the limit of its present growth potential due to cell competition that either results in total birth rate reduction or death rate increase. The tumour can then progress to the final stage by either seeding a metastasis or acquiring a driver mutation. We influence the ensuing evolutionary dynamics by cytotoxic (increasing death rate) or cytostatic (decreasing birth rate) therapy while keeping the effect of the therapy on net growth reduction constant. Comparing the treatments head to head we derive conditions for choosing optimal therapy. We quantify how the choice and the related gain of optimal therapy depends on driver mutation, metastasis, intrinsic cell birth and death rates, and the details of cell competition. We show that detailed understanding of the cell population dynamics could be exploited in choosing the right mode of treatment with substantial therapy gains.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiological EvolutionCytostatic AgentsCytotoxinsDisease ProgressionHumansModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalMutationNeoplasmsNeoplastic ProcessesAntineoplastic AgentsCytostatic AgentsCytotoxins

Identifiers

PMID31738747
PMCPMC6886869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.