Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31738474›Full record

ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2020

Nonlinear Relation Between Burst Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Amplitude and Behavioral Outcome in an Experimental Model of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.

Glenn Franken, Jacques Debets, Elbert A J Joosten

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Current Strategies for the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Glenn FrankenPain Management and Research Centre, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, MUMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5596-1058
Jacques DebetsMuroidean Facility, School of Cardiovascular Diseases, CARIM, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Elbert A J JoostenPain Management and Research Centre, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, MUMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

Abbott Laboratories Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in neuropathic pa
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveDorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) has recently emerged as a neuromodulation modality in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of different Burst-DRGS amplitudes in an experimental model of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN).

methodsDiabetes mellitus was induced in female Sprague-Dawley rats by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (STZ, n = 28). Animals were tested for mechanical hypersensitivity (von Frey paw withdrawal test) before, and four weeks after STZ injection. PDPN rats (n = 13) were implanted with a unilateral bipolar electrode at the L5 DRG. Animals received Burst-DRGS at 0%, 10%, 33%, 50%, 66%, and 80% of motor threshold (MT) in a randomized crossover design on post-implantation days 2-7 (n = 9). Mechanical hypersensitivity was assessed before stimulation onset, 15 and 30 min during stimulation, and 15 and 30 min after stimulation.

resultsBurst-DRGS at amplitudes of 33%, 50%, 66%, and 80% MT resulted in significant attenuation of STZ-induced mechanical hypersensitivity at 15 and 30 min during stimulation, as well as 15 min after cessation of stimulation. No effect on mechanical hypersensitivity was observed for Burst-DRGS at 0% MT and 10% MT. Optimal pain relief and highest responder rates were achieved with Burst-DRGS at 50-66% MT, with an estimated optimum at 52% MT.

conclusionOur findings indicate a nonlinear relationship between Burst-DRGS amplitude and behavioral outcome, with an estimated optimal amplitude of 52% MT. Further optimization and analysis of DRGS driven by insights into the underlying mechanisms related to the various stimulation paradigms is warranted.

Indexed as

Nonlinear DynamicsAnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetic NeuropathiesFemaleGanglia, SpinalHyperalgesiaPain ManagementPain MeasurementRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpinal Cord StimulationTreatment Outcomeburst stimulationdorsal root ganglion stimulationneuromodulationneuropathic painpainful diabetic peripheral neuropathyVon Frey

Identifiers

PMID31738474
PMCPMC7065114
OpenAlexW2982836682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.