ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020
SPDI: data model for variants and applications at NCBI.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Liver eQTL meta-analysis illuminates potential molecular mechanisms of cardiometabolic traits.American journal of human genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Uniform processing and analysis of IGVF massively parallel reporter assay data with MPRAsnakeflow.Genome research · 2026Article
- The GA4GH Categorical Variation Representation Specification: A Unified Computational Framework for Reasoning over Genomic Variant Categories.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Convergence of machine learning and genomics for precision oncology.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- The IGVF catalog-from genetic variation to function.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an MPS-based 513-Plex SNP identity panel for degraded forensic samples.Human genetics · 2025Article
- A graph-based approach to variant description extraction from sequences.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Genetic data normalization for genomic medicine: a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources Genomics reference implementation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Uniform processing and analysis of IGVF massively parallel reporter assay data with MPRAsnakeflow.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- GONNMDA: A Ordered Message Passing GNN Approach for miRNA-Disease Association Prediction.Genes · 2025Article
- Standardization of Genomic Nomenclature across a Diverse Ecosystem of Stakeholders: Evolution and Challenges.Clinical chemistry · 2025Review
- HGVS Nomenclature 2024: improvements to community engagement, usability, and computability.Genome medicine · 2024Article
- Jointly benchmarking small and structural variant calls with vcfdist.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Mapping MAVE data for use in human genomics applications.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Minimum information and guidelines for reporting a multiplexed assay of variant effect.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Recommendations for Uniform Variant Calling of SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequence across Bioinformatic Workflows.Viruses · 2024Article
- Molecularly-Guided Cancer Clinical Trial Matching using FHIR and HL7 Clinical Quality Language: A Proof of Concept.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- vcfdist: accurately benchmarking phased small variant calls in human genomes.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Sync for Genes Phase 5: Computable artifacts for sharing dynamically annotated FHIR-formatted genomic variants.Learning health systems · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationNormalizing sequence variants on a reference, projecting them across congruent sequences and aggregating their diverse representations are critical to the elucidation of the genetic basis of disease and biological function. Inconsistent representation of variants among variant callers, local databases and tools result in discrepancies that complicate analysis. NCBI's genetic variation resources, dbSNP and ClinVar, require a robust, scalable set of principles to manage asserted sequence variants.
resultsThe SPDI data model defines variants as a sequence of four attributes: sequence, position, deletion and insertion, and can be applied to nucleotide and protein variants. NCBI web services convert representations among HGVS, VCF and SPDI and provide two functions to aggregate variants. One, based on the NCBI Variant Overprecision Correction Algorithm, returns a unique, normalized representation termed the 'Contextual Allele'. The SPDI data model, with its four operations, defines exactly the reference subsequence affected by the variant, even in repeat regions, such as homopolymer and other sequence repeats. The second function projects variants across congruent sequences and depends on an alignment dataset of non-assembly NCBI RefSeq sequences (prefixed NM, NR and NG), as well as inter- and intra-assembly-associated genomic sequences (NCs, NTs and NWs), supporting robust projection of variants across congruent sequences and assembly versions. The variant is projected to all congruent Contextual Alleles. One of these Contextual Alleles, typically the allele based on the latest assembly version, represents the entire set, is designated the unique 'Canonical Allele' and is used directly to aggregate variants across congruent sequences. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The SPDI services are available for open access at: https://api.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/variation/v0. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.