Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31737856›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2019

Using Structural Analysis

Richard C Caswell, Martina M Owens, Adam C Gunning, Sian Ellard, Caroline F Wright

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Using Structural AnalysisJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard C CaswellInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter School of Medicine, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0713-4602
Martina M OwensDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2081-0188
Adam C GunningInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter School of Medicine, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Sian EllardDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7620-5526
Caroline F WrightInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter School of Medicine, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2958-5076
University of Exeter · GBRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 200990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the rapid expansion in recent years of databases reporting either benign or pathogenic genetic variations, the interpretation of novel missense variants remains challenging, particularly for clinical or genetic testing laboratories where functional analysis is often unfeasible. Previous studies have shown that thermodynamic analysis of protein structure

Indexed as

genomicsmissense variant interpretationmultiple endocrine neoplasia type 1protein structure

Identifiers

PMID31737856
PMCPMC6846327
OpenAlexW2976563835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.