Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31737798›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2019

Integrating smartphone technology, social support and the outdoor built environment to promote community-based aerobic and resistance-based physical activity: Rationale and study protocol for the '

Anna K Jansson, David R Lubans, Jordan J Smith, Mitch J Duncan, Adrian Bauman, John Attia, Sara L Robards, Ronald C Plotnikoff

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Tensions and Paradoxes of Scaling Up: A Critical Reflection on Physical Activity Promotion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna K JanssonPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
David R LubansPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Jordan J SmithPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Mitch J DuncanPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Adrian BaumanSchool of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
John AttiaSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Sara L RobardsPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Ronald C PlotnikoffPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRegular physical activity can significantly reduce the risk of numerous chronic diseases, and improve bone density and mental health. Yet, only 50% of Australian adults meet the aerobic physical activity guidelines and 9-19% meet the resistance-based physical activity guidelines. The aim of this study is to enhance community-based aerobic and resistance-based physical activity through the use of publicly available outdoor exercise equipment, social support and smartphone technology. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThe DISCUSSION:

trial registrationACTRN12619000868189.

Indexed as

Aerobic exerciseBehavioral changePhysical activityResistance training

Identifiers

PMID31737798
PMCPMC6849073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.