ArticleData in brief2019
Data on a new neurorehabilitation approach targeting functional recovery in stroke patients.
Article in Data in brief, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of the Rehabilitative Efficacy of Copernicus®, a Visual Feedback Device for the Early Start to Locomotion of Post-stroke Patients
ROBOCOP (ROBOtic Care of Post-stroke Pain): Study Protocol for a Randomized, Double-blind Trial to Assess Robot-assisted Functional and Motor Recovery and Impact on Post-stroke Pain Development
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted devices are known to positively affect the recovery of one specific motor effector after stroke. However, it has widely been reported that the functional status of patients is only partially ameliorated after application of this kind of advanced treatment. Here, data about the effect of a new rehabilitation approach has been described in a large population of stroke patients. We sought to validate an integrated rehabilitation system for stroke (IRSS) patients, which is composed of a set of robotic-assisted tools aimed at recovering the entire body. We evaluated the motor recovery in 84 stroke patients equally divided into experimental and control groups to assess the difference between IRSS approach and conventional rehabilitation treatment. We found that IRSS induced a significant improvement as measured by functional neurological scales, such as the barthel index and functional independence measure. The data provided in this article will assist therapists and physicians working for developing new rehabilitation protocols more focused on a holistic functional recovery approach. The data are available at Mendeley Data, https://doi.org/10.17632/wptmgm7zk2.1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.