Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31737611›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2019

Small Molecule Anti-biofilm Agents Developed on the Basis of Mechanistic Understanding of Biofilm Formation.

Katrine Qvortrup, Louise Dahl Hultqvist, Martin Nilsson, Tim Holm Jakobsen, Charlotte Uldahl Jansen, Jesper Uhd, Jens Bo Andersen, Thomas E Nielsen, Michael Givskov, Tim Tolker-Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Coacervate Dense Phase Displaces Surface-EstablishedJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Anti-Biofilm and Anti-Quorum-Sensing Activity ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katrine QvortrupDepartment of Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Louise Dahl HultqvistDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Costerton Biofilm Center, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin NilssonDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Costerton Biofilm Center, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tim Holm JakobsenDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Costerton Biofilm Center, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte Uldahl JansenDepartment of Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Jesper UhdDepartment of Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Jens Bo AndersenDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Costerton Biofilm Center, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas E NielsenDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Costerton Biofilm Center, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael GivskovDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Costerton Biofilm Center, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tim Tolker-NielsenDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Costerton Biofilm Center, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DKSingapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial biofilms are the cause of persistent infections associated with various medical implants and distinct body sites such as the urinary tract, lungs, and wounds. Compared with their free living counterparts, bacteria in biofilms display a highly increased resistance to immune system activities and antibiotic treatment. Therefore, biofilm infections are difficult or impossible to treat with our current armory of antibiotics. The challenges associated with biofilm infections have urged researchers to pursue a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that are involved in the formation and dispersal of biofilms, and this has led to the identification of several steps that could be targeted in order to eradicate these challenging infections. Here we describe mechanisms that are involved in the regulation of biofilm development in

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniianti-biofilm compoundsc-di-GMPEscherichia colipilicides and curlicidesPseudomonas aeruginosaquorum sensing

Identifiers

PMID31737611
PMCPMC6838868
OpenAlexW2984559214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.