Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31737527›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2019

The value of hand grip strength (HGS) as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in congenital heart disease.

Rhoia Clara Neidenbach, Renate Oberhoffer, Lars Pieper, Sebastian Freilinger, Peter Ewert, Harald Kaemmerer, Nicole Nagdyman, Alfred Hager, Jan Müller

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05447390 (Evaluation of the Strength of Handgrip in Patients With Pulmonary Artery Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05447390 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Strength of Handgrip in Patients With Pulmonary Artery Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled55ConditionsPulmonary HypertensionArmsHandgrip strength test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rhoia Clara NeidenbachDepartment of Congenital Heart Defects and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Renate OberhofferDepartment of Congenital Heart Defects and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lars PieperDepartment of Behavioral Epidemiology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian FreilingerDepartment of Congenital Heart Defects and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter EwertDepartment of Congenital Heart Defects and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Harald KaemmererDepartment of Congenital Heart Defects and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nicole NagdymanDepartment of Congenital Heart Defects and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alfred HagerDepartment of Congenital Heart Defects and Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan MüllerInstitute of Preventive Pediatrics, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Deutsches Herzzentrum München · DETechnical University of Munich · DETU Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), there is little data on the diagnostic and prognostic relevance of hand grip strength (HGS) for clinical assignment, while in the general population the loss of muscle strength and mass is an important risk factor in cardiovascular disease which is conversely associated with morbidity and all-cause mortality. This study aimed to assess the degree of muscle dysfunction using HGS as a biomarker in a large group of patients with CHD who often develop muscle dysfunction.

methodsIn total, 385 patients (27.6±13.1 years, 43% female) were included and assigned to 5 diagnostic groups: complex anomalies (n=131), left heart anomalies/aortopathies (n=107), right heart/pulmonary artery anomalies (n=92), primary left to-right-shunts (n=42) and miscellaneous CHD (n=13). Patients with Fontan circulation, chronic cyanosis, morphologic right systemic ventricle, arterial switch operation, or Ebstein's anomaly were analyzed separately. A control group (CG) consisted of 124 healthy individuals (30.1±12.1 years, 42% female). HGS was measured with a Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer.

resultsHGS was reduced in CHD patients compared to controls (35.2±14.6 versus 43.7±14.4 kg). Most impairments were present in females (26.1±7.6 kg). Patients with cyanosis had lower HGS values compared to acyanotic CHD patients (P=0.03). Patients with left heart lesions had the highest HSG values (40.7±14.7 kg), while patients with primary left-to-right shunt lesions had the lowest HSG values (30.9±11.3 kg). Within specific groups of cardiac anomalies, patients with Fontan circulation showed the lowest (P=0.033) and patients with a morphologic right system ventricle showed higher results (P=0.004). The late mid-term survival was favorable, and 7 patients (1.8%) died in a median interval of 422 days (range, 206-1,824 days) after HGS-testing.

conclusionsThis study provides the most comprehensive data on the use of HGS in CHD to date. Grip strength is an easily applicable, repeatedly usable and a cost-effective diagnostic tool to gain a quick, quantifiable assessment of the patient's current muscle function as an expression of cardiac fitness. Considering the low number of patients who died in the observation period, HGS may not be a suitable tool for survival assessment or identification of patients at risk. However, HGS is well suited to determine muscle function and strength and thereby to identify and to follow-up patients who have an increased cardiovascular risk.

Indexed as

congenital heart disease (CHD)follow-upHand grip strength (HGS)prevention

Identifiers

PMID31737527
PMCPMC6837923
OpenAlexW2981008320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.