ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2019
Automatic Detection of Cone Photoreceptors With Fully Convolutional Networks.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated cone photoreceptor detection using synthetic data and deep learning in confocal adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Non-uniform signal pooling across the foveola.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Neural contrast sensitivity is not affected by myopic blur.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- In Vivo Cone Photoreceptor Topography of the Human Foveola.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Neural network assisted annotation and analysis tool to study in-vivo foveolar cone photoreceptor topography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Improving cone identification using merged non-confocal quadrant-detection adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Alignment, calibration, and validation of an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope for high-resolution human foveal imaging.Applied optics · 2024Article
- Pearls and Pitfalls of Adaptive Optics Ophthalmoscopy in Inherited Retinal Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Deep learning-enabled volumetric cone photoreceptor segmentation in adaptive optics optical coherence tomography images of normal and diseased eyes.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Using deep learning for the automated identification of cone and rod photoreceptors from adaptive optics imaging of the human retina.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Active Cell Appearance Model Induced Generative Adversarial Networks for Annotation-Efficient Cell Segmentation and Identification on Adaptive Optics Retinal Images.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2021Article
- Evaluation of focus and deep learning methods for automated image grading and factors influencing image quality in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Spatially Aware Dense-LinkNet Based Regression Improves Fluorescent Cell Detection in Adaptive Optics Ophthalmic Images.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a fully automatic method, based on deep learning algorithms, for determining the locations of cone photoreceptors within adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope images and evaluate its performance against a dataset of manually segmented images.
methodsA fully convolutional network (FCN) based on U-Net architecture was used to generate prediction probability maps and then used a localization algorithm to reduce the prediction map to a collection of points. The proposed method was trained and tested on two publicly available datasets of different imaging modalities, with Dice overlap, false discovery rate, and true positive reported to assess performance.
resultsThe proposed method achieves a Dice coefficient of 0.989, true positive rate of 0.987, and false discovery rate of 0.009 on the first confocal dataset; and a Dice coefficient of 0.926, true positive rate of 0.909, and false discovery rate of 0.051 on the second split detector dataset. Results compare favorably with a previously proposed method, but this method provides quicker (25 times faster) evaluation performance.
conclusionsThe proposed FCN-based method demonstrates that deep learning algorithms can achieve accurate cone localizations, almost comparable to a human expert, while labeling the images. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Manual cone photoreceptor identification is a time-consuming task due to the large number of cones present within a single image; using the proposed FCN-based method could support the image analysis task, drastically reducing the need for manual assessment of the photoreceptor mosaic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.