ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2019
Potential clinical utility of multiple target quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) array to detect microbial pathogens in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross-feeding interactions betweenmSystems · 2026Article
- Molecular Diagnostics, Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns, and Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Pneumonia Patients: A Prospective Study from Jordan and a Call for National Guideline Integration.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Plasma Extracellular Vesicle miRNA Profiles Distinguish Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations and Disease Severity.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022Article
- Sputum sample positivity for Haemophilus influenzae or Moraxella catarrhalis in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evaluation of association with positivity at earlier stable disease timepoints.Respiratory research · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCulture-independent methods such as quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) are more sensitive for detecting pathogens than conventional culture. This study aimed to test the clinical potential of a multiple target qPCR array in identifying sputum pathogens, compared to traditional culture.
methodsForty chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients provided spontaneous sputum and blood samples during an exacerbation event (n=25 patients) and in stable state (n=15 patients). Sputum was processed and analysed by microscopy, culture and sensitivity testing (MCS) to identify living microbial isolates, and multiple target qPCR (44 targets for bacterial and fungal pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes), and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
resultsSix microbial isolates (5 bacterial, 1 fungal) were cultured from 20 exacerbation and 10 stable patient sputum samples. Four of these microbial isolates had their presence in patient sputum confirmed by qPCR. All bacterial targets detected by qPCR were further confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing at a genus level. qPCR identified significantly more bacterial pathogens than culture (P<0.001). The most prevalent bacterial species identified by qPCR were
conclusionsMultiple target qPCR was more sensitive for detection of sputum pathogens in COPD patients than conventional culture. 16S rRNA gene sequencing confirmed the identity at a genus level of all bacterial targets detected by qPCR, as well as identifying bacterial OTUs that could potentially be used to distinguish between exacerbation and stable COPD disease states. Multiple target qPCR pathogen detection in the sputum of COPD patients warrants further investigation to determine how it may influence COPD clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.