ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2019
Intracorporeal direct measurement for localizing peripheral pulmonary nodules during thoracoscopy.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Geometric localization technique combined with modified inflation-deflation method identifies both GGO location and intersegmental planes in pulmonary segmentectomy.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Construction of a risk screening and visualization system for pulmonary nodule in physical examination population based on feature self-recognition machine learning model.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Missing lung nodule? Intra-operative contingency plan with O-arm imaging: a case report.AME case reports · 2022Article
- A novel localization technique for peripheral ground glass opacity using geometric parameters measured on CT images.BMC surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocalizing small lung nodules during thoracoscopy is challenging for thoracic surgeons. In this case series, a novel technique for intraoperative localization that combines preoperative computed tomography (CT) with direct measurement during thoracoscopy is described.
methodsA preoperative CT within two months before surgery was mandatory for precise planning of the resection area. During thoracoscopy, intracorporeal direct measurement (ICDM) for intraoperative localization was undergone if the targeted nodule was non-palpable and non-visualized. According to the location of the targeted nodule, longitudinal, and horizontal landmarks were chosen. The distances between the nodule and these landmarks were obtained from both CT images and intraoperative measurements during thoracoscopy. Based on the measurements, the x-axis and y-axis coordinates of the nodule were calculated and marked on the visceral pleura. A thoracoscopic wedge resection with an adequate margin was performed. From July 2014 to December 2018, ICDM was applied in 27 patients with peripheral pulmonary nodules smaller than 2 cm. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this technique.
resultsTwenty-six of the twenty-seven nodules were successfully identified (96.3%). The nodules included 13 primary lung cancers, 5 metastases, and 9 benign lesions. The median nodule size was 7 mm (range, 4-17 mm), and the median distance of the nodule from the visceral pleura was 8.1 mm (range, 1.0-31.2 mm). The median localization time was 24 minutes (range, 8-109 mm). Two patients (7.4%) had a prolonged air leak, but there was no procedure-related mortality.
conclusionsICDM is an effective and safe method for localizing peripheral lung nodules during thoracoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.