ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2019
Proteomic analysis for identifying the differences in molecular profiling between fanconi anaemia and aplastic anaemia.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidisciplinary approaches to study anaemia with special mention on aplastic anaemia (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment and prognosis of Fanconi anaemia (FA) and acquired aplastic anaemia (AA) differ. However, delayed and inappropriate treatments are administered in FA due to its similarities to AA in presentation. The objective of the current study was to elucidate differences between the molecular mechanisms underlying FA and AA as well as to identify biomarkers and pathways associated with FA via bioinformatics analyses. Proteomic data were obtained from bone marrow samples of patients with FA and AA. Gene ontology analysis was performed using a Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery. KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were conducted using the ClueGO plug-in in Cytoscape. A DEP-associated protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using STRING and visualized in Cytoscape. A total of 114 DEPs, including 71 upregulated proteins and 43 downregulated proteins, were present in the FA samples, compared with those in the AA samples. Upregulated proteins were enriched in the nucleosome assembly, canonical glycolysis, glycolytic process, and the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway, whereas downregulated proteins were enriched in relation to immune response, negative regulation of apoptosis, proteolysis and CoA biosynthesis. Eight hub proteins with a high degree of connectivity were obtained as follows: alpha-enolase (ENO1), HSP90AA1, phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1), HSP90AB1, ACTC1, ACTBL2, EEF1A1 and CFL1. Upregulation of ENO1 and CFL1 in patients with FA was confirmed through a WB experiment, and substantiated by the results of data analyses. Bioinformatics analyses are useful for identification of biomarkers and pathways associated with FA and AA. Some crucial DEPs, such as ENO1, PGK1, ACTC1, ACTBL2, EEF1A1 and CFL1, may play an important role in FA and show potential as serological markers for its early diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31737203PMC6834519W2996915073What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.