ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019
Rapid Calorimetric Detection of Bacterial Contamination: Influence of the Cultivation Technique.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biocalorimetry for the biotechnological use of natural and synthetic macromolecules.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Biosensors in Microbial Ecology: Revolutionizing Food Safety and Quality.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Concentration vs. Optical Density of ESKAPEE Bacteria: A Method to Determine the Optimum Measurement Wavelength.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy-Based Microfluidic Biosensor Using Cell-Imprinted Polymers for Bacteria Detection.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Enhancing insights: exploring the information content of calorespirometric ratio in dynamic soil microbial growth processes through calorimetry.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Proof of concept: real-time viability and metabolic profiling of probiotics with isothermal microcalorimetry.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Microfluidic Sensor Based on Cell-Imprinted Polymer-Coated Microwires for Conductometric Detection of Bacteria in Water.Biosensors · 2023Article
- Absorption/Attenuation Spectral Description of ESKAPEE Bacteria: Application to Seeder-Free Culture Monitoring, Mammalian T-Cell and Bacteria Mixture Analysis and Contamination Description.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Reviewing the state of biosensors and lab-on-a- chip technologies: opportunities for extreme environments and space exploration.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Dehydration Tolerance in Epidemic versus Nonepidemic MRSA Demonstrated by Isothermal Microcalorimetry.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Giant Magnetoresistance Biosensors for Food Safety Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Rapid culture-based detection of Legionella pneumophila using isothermal microcalorimetry with an improved evaluation method.Microbial biotechnology · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern isothermal microcalorimeters (IMC) are able to detect the metabolic heat of bacteria with an accuracy sufficient to recognize even the smallest traces of bacterial contamination of water, food, and medical samples. The modern IMC techniques are often superior to conventional detection methods in terms of the detection time, reliability, labor, and technical effort. What is missing is a systematic analysis of the influence of the cultivation conditions on calorimetric detection. For the acceptance of IMC techniques, it is advantageous if already standardized cultivation techniques can be combined with calorimetry. Here we performed such a systematic analysis using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.