Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31736905›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

The Stain of the Original Salt:

Nicoletta Perini, Fulvio Mercuri, Maria Cristina Thaller, Silvia Orlanducci, Domenico Castiello, Valerio Talarico, Luciana Migliore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Draft Genome Sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2022
    Article
  5. Recent developments in using the molecular decay dating method: a review.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicoletta PeriniDepartment of Biology, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Fulvio MercuriDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Maria Cristina ThallerDepartment of Biology, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Silvia OrlanducciDepartment of Chemical Science and Technology, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Domenico CastielloPo.Te.Co. s.c.r.l., Santa Croce sull'Arno, Italy.
Valerio TalaricoPo.Te.Co. s.c.r.l., Santa Croce sull'Arno, Italy.
Luciana MiglioreDepartment of Biology, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal hides are one of man's earliest and mostly used materials; many rawhide products, primarily leather, have for centuries been used for several purposes. The peculiar mechanical properties of leather depend on the hide composition, a dense collagen feltwork. Unfortunately, due to their proteic composition, rawhides may undergo microbial attack and biodeterioration. Over centuries, different processes and treatments (brining, vegetal or chrome tanning, tawing, etc.) were set up to face the biological attack and modify/stabilise the hide's mechanical properties. Nevertheless, even present-day rawhides are subjected to biological colonisation, and traces of this colonisation are clearly shown in Chrome(III) tanned leathers (in the wet blue stage), with obvious economic damages. The colonisation traces on tanned leathers consist of isolated or coalescent red patches, known as

Indexed as

Halobacterium salinarumleatherparchmentpurple spot deteriorationred heat deteriorationsalt-curing of hidestanned rawhides

Identifiers

PMID31736905
PMCPMC6828845
OpenAlexW2982397952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.