ArticleFrontiers in physiology2019
Validity and Reliability of a New Specific Parkour Test: Physiological and Performance Responses.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Male collegiate volleyball players' depth jump biomechanical adaptations to eight-week complex-contrast training.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Enhancing Motor Competence in Rhythmic Gymnastics: Effects of the Overlapping Waves Strategy in School-Based Physical Education.The Journal of school health · 2026Article
- Article
- Inspirations of traditional Chinese martial arts Qinggong training for parkour.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- A predictive model for vertical ground reaction force during incline push-ups.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Relationships between sport-specific tests and their validity in predicting the time-motion profile in international taekwondo matches.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- A study on the effects of modified sprint interval trainingon physical fitness test scores and the quantitative and dose-response relationships among Chinese male university students.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Asymmetry in college basketball players: change of direction performance in shuffle movement and 505 test.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- What Makes Parkour Unique? A Narrative Review Across Miscellaneous Academic Fields.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Effects of Neuromuscular Training on Motor Competence and Physical Performance in Young Female Volleyball Players.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Main aim of this study was examining validity and reliability of using a new specific Parkour repeated sprint ability test (SPRSA) for assessing repeated sprint ability while facing obstacles and establishing between-day reliability and sensitivity of SPRSA related to its physiological and performance responses. Thirteen high-level traceurs (three females) performed in random order and twice eight tests for assessing a total of 23 variables: SPRSA (a typical maximal-speed shuttle run interspersed with four Parkour competition-common fundamentals) and seven established fitness tests, core stability, hand-grip, vertical-jump, long-jump, pull-up, 300-m shuttle run (as a field test for anaerobic capacity), and Leger test. Except for muscular elasticity index of vertical jump test (intra-class Correlation Coefficient model 3,1 [ICC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.