Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31736725›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2019

Acute Chemogenetic Activation of CamKIIα-Positive Forebrain Excitatory Neurons Regulates Anxiety-Like Behaviour in Mice.

Sonali S Salvi, Sthitapranjya Pati, Pratik R Chaudhari, Praachi Tiwari, Toshali Banerjee, Vidita A Vaidya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Disentangling the Neural Circuits of Arousal and Anxiety-Like Behavior.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Differential effects of GABAPsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonali S SalviDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India.
Sthitapranjya PatiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India.
Pratik R ChaudhariDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India.
Praachi TiwariDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India.
Toshali BanerjeeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India.
Vidita A VaidyaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, India.
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety disorders are amongst the most prevalent mental health disorders. Several lines of evidence have implicated cortical regions such as the medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and insular cortex along with the hippocampus in the top-down modulation of anxiety-like behaviour in animal models. Both rodent models of anxiety, as well as treatment with anxiolytic drugs, result in the concomitant activation of multiple forebrain regions. Here, we sought to examine the effects of chemogenetic activation or inhibition of forebrain principal neurons on anxiety and despair-like behaviour. We acutely activated or inhibited Ca

Indexed as

anxietyclozapine-N-oxideDREADDelevated plus mazehM3DqhM4Dilight–dark avoidance testopen field test

Identifiers

PMID31736725
PMCPMC6828652
OpenAlexW2981973882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.