Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31736716›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2019

Age-Related Differences in Functional and Structural Connectivity in the Spatial Navigation Brain Network.

Stephen Ramanoël, Elizabeth York, Marine Le Petit, Karine Lagrené, Christophe Habas, Angelo Arleo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Brain-Cognition Fingerprinting via Graph-GCCA with Contrastive Learning.Machine learning in clinical neuroimaging : 7th international workshop, MLCN 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 10, 2024, proceedings. MLCN (Workshop) (7th : 2024 : Marrakesh, Morocco) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen RamanoëlSorbonne Universités, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Elizabeth YorkSorbonne Universités, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Marine Le PetitSorbonne Universités, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Karine LagrenéSorbonne Universités, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Christophe HabasCHNO des Quinze-Vingts, INSERM-DHOS CIC 1423, Paris, France.
Angelo ArleoSorbonne Universités, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial navigation involves multiple cognitive processes including multisensory integration, visuospatial coding, memory, and decision-making. These functions are mediated by the interplay of cerebral structures that can be broadly separated into a posterior network (subserving visual and spatial processing) and an anterior network (dedicated to memory and navigation planning). Within these networks, areas such as the hippocampus (HC) are known to be affected by aging and to be associated with cognitive decline and navigation impairments. However, age-related changes in brain connectivity within the spatial navigation network remain to be investigated. For this purpose, we performed a neuroimaging study combining functional and structural connectivity analyses between cerebral regions involved in spatial navigation. Nineteen young (μ = 27 years, σ = 4.3; 10 F) and 22 older (μ = 73 years, σ = 4.1; 10 F) participants were examined in this study. Our analyses focused on the parahippocampal place area (PPA), the retrosplenial cortex (RSC), the occipital place area (OPA), and the projections into the visual cortex of central and peripheral visual fields, delineated from independent functional localizers. In addition, we segmented the HC and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) from anatomical images. Our results show an age-related decrease in functional connectivity between low-visual areas and the HC, associated with an increase in functional connectivity between OPA and PPA in older participants compared to young subjects. Concerning the structural connectivity, we found age-related differences in white matter integrity within the navigation brain network, with the exception of the OPA. The OPA is known to be involved in egocentric navigation, as opposed to allocentric strategies which are more related to the hippocampal region. The increase in functional connectivity between the OPA and PPA may thus reflect a compensatory mechanism for the age-related alterations around the HC, favoring the use of the preserved structural network mediating egocentric navigation. Overall, these findings on age-related differences of functional and structural connectivity may help to elucidate the cerebral bases of spatial navigation deficits in healthy and pathological aging.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeuroimagingSpatial NavigationYoung Adultconnectivitydiffusionhealthy agingMRIresting-statespatial navigationvision

Identifiers

PMID31736716
PMCPMC6828843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.