Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31736631›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary toxicology2018

Erman Salih Istifli, Rima Çelik, Mehmet Tahir Hüsunet, Nesrin Çetinel, Osman Demirhan, Hasan Basri Ila

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erman Salih IstifliFaculty of Science and Letters, Department of Biology, Cukurova University, Balcalı, Adana, Turkey.
Rima ÇelikFaculty of Science and Letters, Department of Biology, Cukurova University, Balcalı, Adana, Turkey.
Mehmet Tahir HüsunetFaculty of Science and Letters, Department of Biology, Cukurova University, Balcalı, Adana, Turkey.
Nesrin ÇetinelFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Cukurova University, Balcalı, Adana, Turkey.
Osman DemirhanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Cukurova University, Balcalı, Adana, Turkey.
Hasan Basri IlaFaculty of Science and Letters, Department of Biology, Cukurova University, Balcalı, Adana, Turkey.
Cukurova University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sertraline (SRT) is an antidepressant agent used as a neuronal selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). SRT blocks serotonin reuptake and increases serotonin stimulation of somatodendritic serotonin 1A receptor (5-HT1AR) and terminal autoreceptors in the brain. In the present study, the genotoxic potential of SRT was evaluated using cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) cytome assay in peripheral blood lymphocytes of healthy human subjects. DNA cleavage-protective effects of SRT were analyzed on plasmid pBR322. In addition, biochemical parameters of total oxidant status (TOS) and total antioxidant status (TAS) in blood plasma were measured to quantitate oxidative stress. Human peripheral blood lymphocytes were exposed to four different concentrations (1.25, 2.5, 3.75 and 5 μg/mL) of SRT for 24- or 48-h treatment periods. In this study, SRT was not found to induce MN formation either in 24- or 48-h treatment periods. In contrast, SRT concentration-dependently decreased the percentage of MN and MNBN (r=-0.979,

Indexed as

cytotoxicitymicronucleusoxidative stresspBR322peripheral blood lymphocytessertraline

Identifiers

PMID31736631
PMCPMC6853002
OpenAlexW2981337051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.