Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31736620›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2019

Distribution and current conservation status of the Mexican Goodeidae (Actinopterygii, Cyprinodontiformes).

John Lyons, Kyle R Piller, Juan Miguel Artigas-Azas, Omar Dominguez-Dominguez, Pablo Gesundheit, Michael Köck, Martina Medina-Nava, Norman Mercado-Silva, Arely Ramírez García, Kearstin M Findley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John LyonsUniversity of Wisconsin Zoological Museum, Madison, USA.
Kyle R PillerSoutheastern Louisiana University, Hammond, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1289-9351
Juan Miguel Artigas-AzasSan Luis Potosí, México.
Omar Dominguez-DominguezUniversidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, México.
Pablo GesundheitUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0648-6190
Michael KöckHaus des Meeres Aqua-Terra Zoo, Vienna, Austria.
Martina Medina-NavaUniversidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, México.
Norman Mercado-SilvaUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, México.
Arely Ramírez GarcíaUniversidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Morelia, México.
Kearstin M FindleySoutheastern Louisiana University, Hammond, USA.
Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo · MXSoutheastern Louisiana University · USUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current distribution and abundance of the 40 species of Goodeidae fishes known from Mexico are described, and a total of 84 Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESUs) is designated within these species. Two species and four ESUs are likely extinct with no captive populations, and three species and eight ESUs are probably extinct in the wild but have at least one captive population in Mexico, the United States, or Europe. Of the 35 extant species, the analyses indicate that nine should be considered as critically endangered, 14 as endangered, nine as vulnerable, and only three as least concern. Twenty-seven of these species have experienced substantial declines in distribution or abundance or both since 2000, and only eight appear to have remained relatively stable. Of the 72 extant ESUs, our analyses indicate that 29 should be considered as critically endangered, 21 as endangered, 18 as vulnerable, and only four as least concern. Brief summaries of the historic and current distributions and abundance of each species are provided, as well as ESU. Three strategies are recommended to conserve Mexican goodeids: protect the best-quality remaining habitats where goodeids still persist, restore degraded habitat and re-introduce species or ESUs where practical, and establish captive populations to ensure continued survival of the many species and ESUs that will almost inevitably go extinct in the coming years. Limited resources require cooperation and collaboration between scientists, conservationists, and aquarium hobbyists for successful captive maintenance.

Indexed as

Captive maintenanceEvolutionarily Significant UnitGoodeinaeMexico

Identifiers

PMID31736620
PMCPMC6848252
OpenAlexW2987510807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.