Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31736537›Full record

ReviewPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology2019

Advances in the development and use of

Tanmoy Sarkar, Radhakrishnan Thankappan, Gyan P Mishra, Bhagwat D Nawade

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. TheInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Overexpression ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Biotechnological Interventions in Tomato (Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tanmoy Sarkar1ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research, Post Box 1, Junagadh, Gujarat 362001 India.
Radhakrishnan Thankappan1ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research, Post Box 1, Junagadh, Gujarat 362001 India.ORCID 0000-0001-8713-3196
Gyan P Mishra1ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research, Post Box 1, Junagadh, Gujarat 362001 India.
Bhagwat D Nawade1ICAR-Directorate of Groundnut Research, Post Box 1, Junagadh, Gujarat 362001 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abiotic stresses negatively influence the survival, biomass production, and yield of crops. Tolerance to diverse abiotic stresses in plants is regulated by multiple genes responding differently to various stress conditions. Genetic engineering approaches have helped develop transgenic crops with improved abiotic stress tolerance including yields. The dehydration-responsive element binding protein (DREB) is a stress-responsive transcription factor that modulates the expression of downstream stress-inducible genes, which confer simultaneous tolerance to multiple stresses. This review focuses on advances in the development of

Indexed as

Climate resilienceDehydration-responsive element binding proteinFunctional markersOmicsTransgenic cropYield traits

Identifiers

PMID31736537
PMCPMC6825097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.