Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31736433›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

The Tumor Target Segmentation of Nasopharyngeal Cancer in CT Images Based on Deep Learning Methods.

Shihao Li, Jianghong Xiao, Ling He, Xingchen Peng, Xuedong Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Automated Segmentation of Lymph Nodes on Neck CT Scans Using Deep Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Surgery.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shihao LiNational Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science on Synthetic Vision, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6418-7818
Jianghong XiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ling HeDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xingchen PengDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xuedong YuanCollege of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0240-2831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiotherapy is the main treatment strategy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A major factor affecting radiotherapy outcome is the accuracy of target delineation. Target delineation is time-consuming, and the results can vary depending on the experience of the oncologist. Using deep learning methods to automate target delineation may increase its efficiency. We used a modified deep learning model called U-Net to automatically segment and delineate tumor targets in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Patients were randomly divided into a training set (302 patients), validation set (100 patients), and test set (100 patients). The U-Net model was trained using labeled computed tomography images from the training set. The U-Net was able to delineate nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumors with an overall dice similarity coefficient of 65.86% for lymph nodes and 74.00% for primary tumor, with respective Hausdorff distances of 32.10 and 12.85 mm. Delineation accuracy decreased with increasing cancer stage. Automatic delineation took approximately 2.6 hours, compared to 3 hours, using an entirely manual procedure. Deep learning models can therefore improve accuracy, consistency, and efficiency of target delineation in T stage, but additional physician input may be required for lymph nodes.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Gradingautomatic delineationdeep learningnasopharyngeal cancer

Identifiers

PMID31736433
PMCPMC6862777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.