ArticleCirculation2020
Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus Valsartan in Women Compared With Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From PARAGON-HF.
Article in Circulation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 198 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients (NYHA Class II-IV) With Preserved Ejection Fraction (PARAGON-HF)
Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Biomarker in Heart Failure
Who cites it
198 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 368 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Advances in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review of Therapeutic and Mechanistic Evidence.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Pooled it
- Systolic blood pressure lower than 130 mmHg in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Pooled it
- Sex Matters: A Comprehensive Comparison of Female and Male Hearts.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of sacubitril-valsartan in the treatment of ventricular remodeling in patients with heart failure after acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy in men and women with acute heart failure: insights from PUSH-AHF.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Trial
- Sex Differences in Efficacy of Multidomain Rehabilitation Among Older Adults With Acute HF: The REHAB-HF Trial.JACC. Heart failure · 2025Trial
- Comprehensive Analysis of the Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan According to Sex Among Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction in PARADIGM-HF.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Achieved dose and treatment discontinuation of candesartan in men and women with chronic heart failure: data from CHARM.ESC heart failure · 2024Trial
- Sex Differences in Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction With Low Ejection Fraction: Insights From PARADISE-MI.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Trial
- Sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a pre-specified participant-level pooled analysis of PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF.European heart journal · 2023Trial
- Effects of Empagliflozin in Women and Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.Circulation · 2022Trial
- Empagliflozin, Health Status, and Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: The EMPEROR-Preserved Trial.Circulation · 2022Trial
- Differences in NT-proBNP Response and Prognosis in Men and Women With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Trial
- Hemodynamic Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus Enalapril in Patients With Heart Failure in the EVALUATE-HF Study: Effect Modification by Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Sex.Circulation. Heart failure · 2021Trial
- Systolic Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2020Trial
- Redesigning cardiovascular medicine around sex differences.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in women: a sex-specific clinical review.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Women: Sex-Specific Insights Across the Continuum from Diagnosis to Outcomes.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
138 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
30 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnlike heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, there is no approved treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, the predominant phenotype in women. Therefore, there is a greater heart failure therapeutic deficit in women compared with men.
methodsIn a prespecified subgroup analysis, we examined outcomes according to sex in the PARAGON-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction), which compared sacubitril-valsartan and valsartan in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The primary outcome was a composite of first and recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes. We also report secondary efficacy and safety outcomes.
resultsOverall, 2479 women (51.7%) and 2317 men (48.3%) were randomized. Women were older and had more obesity, less coronary disease, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels than men. For the primary outcome, the rate ratio for sacubitril-valsartan versus valsartan was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.59-0.90) in women and 1.03 (95% CI, 0.84-1.25) in men (
conclusionsAs compared with valsartan, sacubitril-valsartan seemed to reduce the risk of heart failure hospitalization more in women than in men. Whereas the possible sex-related modification of the effect of treatment has several potential explanations, the present study does not provide a definite mechanistic basis for this finding. CLINICAL
trial registrationhttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01920711.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.