Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31736262›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2020

Effect of Streptomyces probiotics on the gut microbiota of Litopenaeus vannamei challenged with Vibrio parahaemolyticus.

José Manuel Mazón-Suástegui, Joan Sebastian Salas-Leiva, Ricardo Medina-Marrero, Ricardo Medina-García, Milagro García-Bernal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Host-microbiome interaction in fish and shellfish: An overview.Fish and shellfish immunology reports · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

José Manuel Mazón-SuásteguiCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste (CIBNOR), La Paz, B.C.S, México.ORCID 0000-0003-4074-1180
Joan Sebastian Salas-LeivaCátedra-CONACyT, Departamento de Medio Ambiente y Energía, Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados, Chihuahua, México.ORCID 0000-0002-4141-140X
Ricardo Medina-MarreroCentro de Bioactivos Químicos, Universidad Central de Las Villas, Santa Clara, Villa Clara, Cuba.ORCID 0000-0001-5561-5481
Ricardo Medina-GarcíaFacultad de Química-Farmacia, Universidad Central de Las Villas, Santa Clara, Villa Clara, Cuba.
Milagro García-BernalCentro de Bioactivos Químicos, Universidad Central de Las Villas, Santa Clara, Villa Clara, Cuba.ORCID 0000-0002-3350-7284
Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de las Villas (UCLV) · CUCentro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados · MXCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the intestinal microbiota of juveniles of the White shrimp Litopenaus vannamei, whose feed was enriched with three probiotic formulations: Streptomyces sp. RL8 (RL8); a mix of Lactobacillus graminis and Streptomyces spp. RL8 and N7 (Lac-Strep); and a mix of Bacillus spp. and Streptomyces spp. RL8 and N7 (Bac-Strep). The analysis was performed by sequencing the V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene of treated animals and the control group before and after Vibrio parahaemolyticus challenge. After challenge, the highest Shannon diversity indexes corresponded to RL8 and Bac-Strep (3.94 ± 0.11 and 3.39 ± 0.3, respectively) and the lowest to the control group (2.58 ± 0.26). The most abundant phyla before and after challenge were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. The principal component analysis and Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles (STAMP) showed that the gut microbiota of the groups RL8 and Bac-Strep after challenge was different from the other experimental groups, which was characterized by a higher bacterial diversity, as well as a significant stimulation of the Bacteriovorax population and other antimicrobial producing genera that protected shrimp from infection.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeStreptomycesAnimalsBiodiversityMicrobial InteractionsPenaeidaeProbioticsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SVibrio parahaemolyticusRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacteriovoraxLitopenaus vannameiMicrobiomeStreptomycesVibrio

Identifiers

PMID31736262
PMCPMC7002121
OpenAlexW2984146612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.