Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31736167›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2021

Feasibility of

Quincy Q van Houtum, Firdaus F A A Mohamed Hoesein, Joost J J C Verhoeff, Peter P S N van Rossum, Anne A S R van Lindert, Tijl T A van der Velden, Wybe W J M van der Kemp, Dennis D W J Klomp, Catalina C S Arteaga de Castro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. NMR in biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Development of a Double TunedNMR in biomedicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. PCA denoising and Wiener deconvolution ofMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Feasibility ofNMR in biomedicine · 2021
    Article
  10. RF Coil Setup forFrontiers in neurology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Quincy Q van HoutumRadiology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6690-1018
Firdaus F A A Mohamed HoeseinRadiology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.
Joost J J C VerhoeffRadiotherapy Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.
Peter P S N van RossumRadiotherapy Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.
Anne A S R van LindertRespiratory Medicine Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.
Tijl T A van der VeldenRadiology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.
Wybe W J M van der KempRadiology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.
Dennis D W J KlompRadiology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.
Catalina C S Arteaga de CastroRadiology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1055-2672
University Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, it is difficult to predict effective therapy response to molecular therapies for the treatment of lung cancer based solely on anatomical images.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingComputer SimulationFeasibility StudiesHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMiddle AgedNeckTomography, X-Ray Computed31P MR spectroscopic imagingIn vivo applicationlung carcinomaresponse monitoringX-nuclei MRS

Identifiers

PMID31736167
PMCPMC8244006
OpenAlexW2987554016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.