ReviewPrenatal diagnosis2020
The use of fetal MRI for renal and urogenital tract anomalies.
Review in Prenatal diagnosis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prenatal body fluid analysis in the evaluation of CAKUT.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Fetal Hydronephrosis: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic Pathways, Prognostic Markers, and Management.Cureus · 2026Review
- Genetic Disorders Detectable by Fetal MRI: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- MRI findings in a case of unilateral fetal renal vein thrombosis in a MCDA twin after fetoscopic laser photocoagluation.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Unilateral Renal Agenesis: Prenatal Diagnosis and Postnatal Issues.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Fetal lower urinary tract obstruction: international Delphi consensus on management and core outcome set.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2024Article
- Physiological assessment of the fetal body using MRI: current uses and potential directions.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Congenital giant megaureter prenatally diagnosed: A case report.Urology case reports · 2022Article
- 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating fetal head and abdomen malformations: a preliminary study.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal anomalies are detected in approximately 2% of all fetuses and, among these, genitourinary tract abnormalities account for 30% to 50% of all structural anomalies present at birth. Although ultrasound remains the first line diagnostic modality, fetal MRI provides important additional structural and functional information, especially with the development of faster sequences and the use of functional sequences. The added value of MRI-based imaging is three-fold: (a) improvement of diagnostic accuracy by adequate morphological examination, (b) detection of additional anomalies, and (c) in addition, MRI has the potential to provide information regarding renal function. In this review, we describe the role of fetal MRI in the anatomical evaluation of renal and urogenital tract anomalies, and we also touch upon the contribution of functional MRI to the diagnostic workup of these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31736096What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.